Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Boyd v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 510 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-04-16 No. 1652
Disposition: (No. 1652-Claimant awarded $810.00.) Award: $810.00 Agency: Anna State Hospital
Cite as: Boyd v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 510 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Boyd v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 510 1931-04-16 (No. 1652-Claimant awarded $810.00.) /opinions/v06-p0539-1/

ARTHUR BOYD, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a workman repairing the Anna State Hospital, suffered an injury to his left eye in the course of employment. The court found the State liable under the Workmen's Compensation Act and awarded $810.00.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Statutes cited: Workmen's Compensation Act, Article 3, Clause 1

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made-Workmen's Compensation OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

On October 26, 1929, while employed as a workman for the State in repairs being made by the State to the Anna State Hospital claimant received an injury to his left eye. The injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. His physician's charges were paid by the State. The evidence shows he has suffered a loss of three fourths of the sight of the eye. At the time of the injury the State was engaged in an enterprise declared by Clause 1 of Article 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act to be extra hazardous and is, therefore, liable to pay claimant the compensation provided in that Act to be paid a workman for such injury. The amount due claimant, under the evidence, is $810.00. It is therefore ordered that claimant be and he is allowed an award of $810.00.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.