Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

I. B. Curran v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 308 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-04-16 No. 1617
Disposition: (No. 1617-Claimant awarded $37.50.) Award: $37.50 Agency: Department of Public Health
Cite as: I. B. Curran v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 308 (1931)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s I. B. Curran v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 308 1931-04-16 (No. 1617-Claimant awarded $37.50.) /opinions/v06-p0537-1/

I. B. CURRAN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for rental of a building used by the State Biological Laboratory for three months in 1929. The court found no dispute as to the use or reasonableness of the $12.50 monthly rent and awarded $37.50.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. RENTAL-when award will be made. There being no dispute as to the facts and reasonableness of the claim the court recommends an award for the rental of a building used by a State department.

It appears from the records and affidavit of claimant that there was an arrangement between claimant and defendant for the rental of the building to be used by the State Biological Laboratory of the Department of Public Health. There appears to be no dispute that the quarters were used by the State of Illinois during the months of April, May and June, 1929, at a rental of $12.50 per month. There is no dispute in the records as to the fact that said amount is reasonable for the use of said quarters. The State of Illinois received the benefit of this property during the months in question and therefore the court recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of Thirty-seven-50/100 ($37.50) Dollars.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.