Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Hillman F. Spencer v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 481 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1930-12-18 No. 1516
Disposition: (No. 1516-Claimant awarded $1,528.40.) Award: $1,528.40 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Hillman F. Spencer v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 481 (1930)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Hillman F. Spencer v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 481 1930-12-18 (No. 1516-Claimant awarded $1,528.40.) /opinions/v06-p0502-1/

HILLMAN F. SPENCER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, an employee of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, was injured while riding on a truck during work. The State had already paid $350 and consented to a further award of $1,528.40, which the court recommended.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made. Where it appears from

It appears from the evidence in this case, that claimant was on the 17th day of August, 1928, and for over a year prior thereto, employed by the Department of Public Works and Buildings of the State of Illinois, in the Division of Highways and while assisting in moving a portable or collapsible office building from Kiser to Carrollton, and while engaged in his duties, riding on a truck, he was thrown from the truck, his right foot caught in a tire carrier, and dragged five hundred feet. His flesh and tendons were torn and lacerated.

It appears that the State has already paid claimant $350.00 and consents to a further award for injuries, etc., of $1,528.40.

It is therefore recommended that the claimant be allowed $1,528.40.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.