Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Royal Typewriter Co., Inc. v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 464 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1930-12-16 No. 1265
Disposition: (No. 1265-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Royal Typewriter Co., Inc. v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 464 (1930)

ROYAL TYPEWRITER COMPANY, INC., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant was ordered to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. No cause was shown, so the court dismissed the claim without an award and struck the case from the docket.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where it appears that cause

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where it appears that cause has not been shown why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution the claim will be denied without an award and the case stricken from the docket upon motion of the Attorney General. WINSTON, STRAWN & SHAW, for claimant. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; DAVID J. KADYK, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLANCY delivered the opinion of the court:

Now comes Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, and makes his motion for dismissal, pursuant to an order to show cause entered by this court on the 13th day of November, A. D. 1930, wherein the claimant was ordered to show cause on or before December 3rd, 1930, why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.

And it appearing to the court that cause has not been shown by claimant in accordance with said order, it is hereby ordered that the claim be dismissed without an award and the case stricken from the docket.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.