Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Williams v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 456 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1930-11-12 No. 1641
Disposition: (No. 1641-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Williams v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 456 (1930)
Legacy General 6 denied 1930s Williams v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 456 1930-11-12 (No. 1641-Claim denied.) /opinions/v06-p0477-1/

JOE WILLIAMS, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a prisoner in the Chicago House of Correction, sought $15,000 for injuries from an attack by a fellow inmate. The court dismissed the claim, holding that the House of Correction is not a subdivision of the State under the Department of Public Welfare, so the court lacked jurisdiction.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. JURISDICTION-when court has no jurisdiction. The House of Correction

It appears that claimant was on the 18th day of October, 1927, given a sentence of 30 days in the House of Correction in the City of Chicago, Illinois. The sentence was imposed by a Judge of the Municipal Court of that city. The claimant avers that while he was serving this sentence, he was injured by an attack by a fellow inmate and claims to be seriously injured and asked that he be remunerated by the State of Illinois in the sum of $15,000.00. [*457]

The defendant, the State of Illinois, appears and files a Plea to Jurisdiction and the court now being advised in the premises, is of the opinion that said House of Correction is not a sub-division of the State of Illinois under the control of the Department of Public Welfare and that this is not a claim that can be reviewed by this court. Therefore the plea of the defendant is sustained and claim dismissed.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.