Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Union Bank of Chicago, Admr v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 370 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1930-01-15 No. 1522
Disposition: (No. 1522-Claim denied.) Agency: West Chicago Park Commissioners
Cite as: Union Bank of Chicago, Admr v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 370 (1930)
Legacy General 6 denied 1930s Union Bank of Chicago, Admr v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 370 1930-01-15 (No. 1522-Claim denied.) /opinions/v06-p0391-1/

UNION BANK OF CHICAGO, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARY ROTCHILD, Deceased, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought damages for the wrongful death of a child who fell from a slide in Humboldt Park, alleging the slide was not in good repair. The court sustained the demurrer, holding that the Court of Claims lacked jurisdiction because the park was under the jurisdiction of the West Chicago Park Commissioners, who were capable of suing and being sued.

Claim type: Wrongful Death

Cases cited: Perkins, Fellows & Hamilton v. State of Illinois, 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 197

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when court has no jurisdiction. The court is without

This is a claim based on an alleged fact that Mary Rotchild a minor aged 10 years was playing upon a slide in Humboldt Park, located in the City of Chicago, Illinois, and it is claimed that said slide was not in good order and proper repair, the guard rails being broken off. It appears that the said child fell from said slide and was injured to such an extent that she died from same on the 30th day of July, 1928.

The defendant through the Attorney General comes and files a demurrer and the consideration of this claim now rests upon a question of law which the court wishes to cite its position in the case of Perkins, Fellows & Hamilton v. State of Illinois, which appears in Court of Claims Reports, volume number 4, page 197, and therefore this court finds no reason to depart from this rule as it cannot be urged that said Humboldt Park is not under the jurisdiction of the West Chicago Park Commissioners capable of suing and being sued.

Therefore it is the opinion of this court that the Court of Claims is without jurisdiction in the matter of this suit and the demurrer is sustained.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.