Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Allen v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 360 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-12-18 No. 1532
Disposition: (No. 1532-Claimant awarded $2,898.00.) Award: $2,898.00 Agency: Western Illinois State Teachers College
Cite as: Allen v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 360 (1929)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Allen v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 360 1929-12-18 (No. 1532-Claimant awarded $2,898.00.) /opinions/v06-p0381-1/

RAY H. ALLEN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a referee injured by a basketball during a tournament at Western Illinois State Teachers College, sought compensation. The court applied the Workmen's Compensation Act and awarded $2,898.00 for loss of eye sight and medical expenses.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made-Workmen's Compensation Act. Where the evidence shows claimant, a state employee, received injuries in course of employment an award will be made and the amount measured under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

It appears that the claimant was employed by the Western Illinois State Teachers College at Macomb, to officiate as a referee in a basket-ball tournament and while thus employed, the claimant received an injury by being struck by a basket-ball thrown by one of the team of the State School for the Deaf, which struck the claimant in his right eye and caused him to lose the sight thereof.

Following precedent, this claim should be measured under the Workmen's Compensation Act. There is no contradiction as to the question of the loss of the sight of the eye and the only evidence as to medical service and hospital aid, given to claimant amounted to $1,098.00.

As this court views the law, the claimant could only be properly allowed $15.00 per week and for 120 weeks, making a total of $1,800.00.

Therefore, this court recommends that claimant be allowed $2,898.00.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.