Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Harmon v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 280 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-05-09 No. 1468
Disposition: (No. 1468-Claimant awarded $1,196.50.) Award: $1,196.50 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways
Cite as: Harmon v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 280 (1929)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Harmon v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 280 1929-05-09 (No. 1468-Claimant awarded $1,196.50.) /opinions/v06-p0301-1/

LOREN HARMON, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a state employee, was injured when a truck crashed into him while he was working on a bumper. The court awarded $1,196.50 for medical expenses and lost time, as recommended by the Attorney General.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made for doctor's bills and loss

It appears that claimant was employed by the State of Illinois in the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways. It appears that while on a bumper choking truck, another truck crashed into the claimant and received an injury to his left hip and that hip was draining for a long time; that the State did not pay his doctor bills; that he had to undergo an operation in December, 1928. [*281]

It appears that the doctor bills and other services for the benefit of claimant and loss of time amounted to $1,196.50.

The Attorney General comes and recommends that claimant be allowed said amount.

Therefore it is recommended by the court that claimant be allowed the sum of Eleven Hundred Ninety-six and 50/100 ($1,196.50) Dollars.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.