Legacy General 6 awarded 1930s Clark v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 242 1930-04-15 (No. 1475-Claimant awarded $26.33.) /opinions/v06-p0263-1/ ARTHUR R. CLARK, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought $26.33, one-third of the appraised value of a dairy cow slaughtered after reacting to a tuberculosis test. The Director of Agriculture approved the claim, but payment was delayed until the appropriation lapsed; the court awarded the amount.
Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- ANIMALS.-When award will be made. When it appears claimant failed
ANIMALS.-When award will be made. When it appears claimant failed to receive compensation for the destruction of a dairy cow, which reacted to a tuberculosis test for the reason that the appropriation for such purpose had lapsed, an award will be made upon the recommendation of the Attorney General.
CHARLES H. THOMPSON, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; ROY D. JOHNSON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARDY delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim for $26.33 which represents one-third of the appraised value of a dairy cow which was slaughtered after a tuberculosis test had been made and which the said animal reacted. It appeared that the Director of Agriculture approved the claim as being just and on account of delay in mails or for other reasons the claim was not paid until the appropriation under which these claims are handled, had lapsed.
The Attorney General recommends an award in said amount, and therefore this court recommends that claimant be awarded the sum of $26.33.
Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.