Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Thomas v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 230 Illinois Court of Claims Filed April 25, 1929 No. 1439
Disposition: (No. 1439-Claimant awarded $4,000.00.) Award: $4,000.00
Cite as: Thomas v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 230 (1929)
Line of Duty Compensation 6 awarded 1920s Thomas v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 230 April 25, 1929 (No. 1439-Claimant awarded $4,000.00.) /opinions/v06-p0251-1/

EDGAR THOMAS, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, an employee of the State, suffered a severe arm injury while loading concrete markers in the course of employment. The court recommended an award of $4,000 under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made-Workmen's Compensation Act. When it appears the claimant received injury in course of employment while working upon a hard road, an award will be made and the amount determined under the Workmen's Compensation Act. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made for injuries resulting in ACTIONS AND DEFENSES-when allowance of an award does not affect OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

It appears that claimant while employed by the defendant the State of Illinois on Dec. 31st, 1927, and in the course of his employment while assisting in loading concrete right of way marker into the back of a truck at a point just east of the hardroad on State Bond Issue Route No. 31 south of the city limits of Lewistown, Illinois, his hand and arm were caught and the right arm torn from the socket at the shoul-der, it appearing the accident completely disabled his arm for many months. And it also appears from the record that claimant is generally disabled. It appears also that claimant is the father of five children all under the age of 16 years at the time of the accident. It also appears that there is a doc-tor and hospital bill accrued at the time of filing the claim of $170.25.

This is a case where the injury occurred in the course of employment and should be considered under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Taking all the facts under consideration the court recom-mends that claimant be allowed the sum of Four Thousand Dollars. [*231] (Claims allowed.)

JOHANNA ROBEZA, 1441; PAULINE GRIVETTI, 1487; MARY HORN, 1486.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.