Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Mooney v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 225 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-04-25 No. 1430
Disposition: (No. 1430-Claimant awarded $671.75.) Award: $671.75 Agency: State Prison at Statesville
Cite as: Mooney v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 225 (1929)
Line of Duty Compensation 6 awarded 1920s Mooney v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 225 1929-04-25 (No. 1430-Claimant awarded $671.75.) /opinions/v06-p0246-1/

WILLIAM C. MOONEY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a prison guard, injured his foot when he fell on concrete steps in the dark. He sought compensation for medical expenses and permanent partial disability. The court awarded $671.75 for medical bills and 15% loss of use of the foot, but denied additional lost wages.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made. Where it appears from SAME-when no award will be made for loss of time and wages. The

The claimant states that while employed by the defendant in the capacity as guard at the state prison at Statesville and while making his rounds at nine o'clock in the evening and the darkness occasioned by the turning out of cell lights, [*226] he struck his left foot against one of the concrete steps and caused him to fall. It appears that claimant's foot became infected and thereafter an operation was performed by removing the first phalanx of the big toe on the left foot which resulted in ankylosis of the second phalanx and according to the testimony of the physician of the State Prison claimant suffered a fifteen per cent loss of the use of his left foot. The claimant's doctor bill which is not disputed, amounted to One Hundred Ninety-five ($195.00) Dollars, and his hospital bill amounted to the sum of One Hundred Eighty-four 75/100 ($184.75) Dollars, these amounts in addition to the sum of $292.00 based on a fifteen per cent loss of foot making the sum of Six Hundred Seventy-one 75/100 ($671.75) Dollars.

The claimant is also asking in addition thereto for loss of time and wages which the court is of the opinion not within the rules of the Workmen's Compensation Act, and which additional amount is not recommended by the Attorney General. The Attorney General however does recommend that an award in the sum of $671.75 be made and which appears to be proper to this court.

Therefore the court recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of $671.75.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.