Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Wittman v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 216 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-04-25 No. 1402
Disposition: (No. 1402-Claimant awarded $3,750.00.) Award: $3,750.00 Agency: State Hospitals
Cite as: Wittman v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 216 (1929)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Wittman v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 216 1929-04-25 (No. 1402-Claimant awarded $3,750.00.) /opinions/v06-p0237-1/

ANTHONY G. WITTMAN, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a staff physician at a state hospital, lost both hands due to an infection from performing an autopsy on an embalmed body without knowledge of the embalming. The court awarded $3,750.00 under the Workmen's Compensation Act, as that was the only measure of damages available.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made. Workmen's Compensa-

It appears that claimant was regularly employed by the State of Illinois as a staff physician in one of the State Hospitals. It appears that part of his duties was to perform autopsies and during the summer of 1913, he performed an autopsy on the body of a colored man. The body was embalmed but at the time of the autopsy the doctor did not know this. The doctor's hands became infected and he lost both of his hands through this condition.

It appears from the record that the claimant suffered a great loss and it is urged by his attorneys that he should recover a gross sum of Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty-five ($9,765.00) Dollars.

The Attorney General comes and admits that under the Compensation Act that claimant should recover the sum of Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty ($3,750.00) Dollars.

This court deeply sympathizes with the claimant but it appears that to be in line with procedure of this court that [*217] the Workmen's Compensation Law is the only measure upon which this court can consider damages in this case.

It is therefore recommended that claimant be allowed the sum of Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty ($3,750.00) Dollars.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.