Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Electric Appliance Company v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-03-28 No. 1331
Disposition: (No. 1331- Claimant awarded $67.30.) Award: $67.30 Agency: Southern Illinois Penitentiary
Cite as: Electric Appliance Company v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 (1929)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Electric Appliance Company v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 1929-03-28 (No. 1331- Claimant awarded $67.30.) /opinions/v06-p0205-1/

ELECTRIC APPLIANCE COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS. Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment for merchandise delivered to the Southern Illinois Penitentiary on July 10, 1925, under an order dated July 5, 1925. The court found the claim just and awarded $67.30.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-when award will be made for supplies furnished to the OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This is a claim based on an order for the delivery of merchandise dated July 5, 1925, and signed by Elmer J. Green of Menard, Illinois, for shipment to the Southern Illinois Penitentiary. The claimant states that shipment of merchandise was made by claimant on July 10th, 1925, at said Southern Illinois Penitentiary at Menard, Illinois, to be used in the Water Works Plant at said penitentiary. A copy of the invoice is attached to the declaration.

The statement filed by the Attorney General has attached thereto a copy of a letter, marked Exhibit B, signed by Rodney H. Brandon, Director, stating that "I believe this is a just claim and should be allowed".

We, therefore, award the claimant the sum of $67.30.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.