Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Huguelet v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 181 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-03-28 No. 1355
Disposition: (No. 1355-Claimant awarded $4,200.00.) Award: $4,200.00
Cite as: Huguelet v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 181 (1929)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Huguelet v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 181 1929-03-28 (No. 1355-Claimant awarded $4,200.00.) /opinions/v06-p0202-1/

ANNA P. HUGUELET, Widow of EDWARD J. HUGUELET, Deceased, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant, widow of a deceased state employee, sought compensation for her husband's death which occurred in the course of employment. The court granted a rehearing and awarded $4,200.00 under the Workmen's Compensation Act, finding the widow and minor child were dependent on the deceased.

Claim type: Wrongful Death

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made for the death of a state WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-when award will be made under. Where REHEARING-when award will be made upon petition for rehearing. Af-

It appears that claimant, widow of said deceased, presents a cause of action upon petition for rehearing not contemplated when the case was heard. [*182]

Upon application of claimant, rehearing was granted, and it does now appear that said deceased was an employee of the State of Illinois, and while in the course of employment, he sustained injuries which caused his death and therefore under the Workmen's Compensation Act of the State, the widow of said deceased is entitled to recover, as it appears she and one minor child were dependent upon the deceased for a living.

The court believes that the Workmen's Compensation Act controls and that claimant's husband sustained injury and lost his life while in the employ of the State and consequently is entitled to recover, measured by the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Therefore, it is recommended that claimant be allowed the sum of $4,200.00 (Forty-two Hundred and no/100 Dollars).

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.