Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Schultz v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 141 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-02-13 No. 1253
Disposition: (No. 1253-Claimant award $913.43.) Award: $913.43
Cite as: Schultz v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 141 (1929)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s Schultz v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 141 1929-02-13 (No. 1253-Claimant award $913.43.) /opinions/v06-p0162-1/

RAYMOND W. SCHULTZ, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant was injured while working on a state road construction project when a cement shed slid onto him. The court applied the Workmen's Compensation Act and awarded $913.43 based on the Attorney General's calculation of 50% permanent loss of limb.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURIES-when award will be made. Where claimant receives WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-when Workmen's Compensation Act

It appears that claimant was injured while employed as a day laborer in the construction of a hard road by the State of Illinois near Morton, Illinois. The injury was sustained on Sept. 9th, 1924. It seems that claimant was working in due course of employment behind a cement shed when the cement shed started sliding and the claimant was caught under the slide and about two cars of cement were piled on and around him. He was taken to a doctor's office and it was found that the left leg was broken above and below the knee, the left hip dislocated, the right arm cut above the elbow and the face cut and scratched.

It would appear that claimant suffered a very serious injury, however this case must be considered under the Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of Illinois. It appears that all the hospital expenses of the claimant were assumed or paid by the State of Illinois.

The Attorney General comes and contends that the measure of damages would be based on fifty per cent of the permanent loss of the limb in connection with the average daily wages which he was receiving at the time of the injury. It is the opinion of the court that the Attorney General's contention is according to the precedent of this court. [*142]

It is therefore considered that claim be allowed and this court recommends that this claimant be allowed the sum of Nine Hundred Thirteen and 43/100 Dollars.

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.