JESSIE MEAD HENION, as Executrix, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant moved to dismiss the case, and the court granted the dismissal as there was no reason not to do so.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where it appears that there OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where it appears that there is no reason why the case should not be dismissed upon motion of claimant, same will be dismissed. VENT & WARFIELD, for claimant. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLETON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where it appears that there is no reason why the case should not be dismissed upon motion of claimant, same will be dismissed.

VENT & WARFIELD, for claimant.

OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLETON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Per CURIAM: This cause coming on to be heard upon motion of claimant that the above entitled cause be dismissed, and it appearing that there is no reason why said cause should not be dismissed, It is therefore considered by the court that said cause be, and the same is hereby dismissed.