Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Lenox v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 127 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1929-01-15 No. 1373
Disposition: (No. 1373-Claimant awarded $1,500.00.) Award: $1,500.00 Agency: Division of Highways, Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Lenox v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 127 (1929)
Line of Duty Compensation 6 awarded 1920s Lenox v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 127 1929-01-15 (No. 1373-Claimant awarded $1,500.00.) /opinions/v06-p0148-1/

HAROLD LENOX, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a motorcycle officer, accidentally shot himself in the leg while on duty, causing permanent partial injury. The court found the injury occurred in the line of duty and awarded $1,500.00.

Claim type: Line Of Duty Death

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-when award will be made. Where it appears from OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

The claimant herein was a motorcycle officer, an employee in the Division of Highways, Department of Public Works and Buildings of the State of Illinois. He received a gun shot wound in his right leg by reason of dropping his gun, which was accidently discharged.

The wound was in the calf of the leg, penetrating entirely through the leg muscle just below the knee, severing the nerve which controls the muscle which raises and lowers the foot.

This accident occurred to the claimant in line of duty in the course of his employment. He was married and had four children under the age of sixteen years at the time of the accident.

It would appear to the court that claimant was injured in line of duty and from all the evidence, it is the opinion of the court that the claimant suffered permanent partial injury and it is the opinion of the court and the court recommends that claimant be allowed the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars, ($1,500.00).

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.