Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

McKenney v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 113 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1928-12-05 No. 1319
Disposition: (No. 1319-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) Award: $2,000.00
Cite as: McKenney v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 113 (1928)
Legacy General 6 awarded 1920s McKenney v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 113 1928-12-05 (No. 1319-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) /opinions/v06-p0136-1/

DOUGLAS I. McKENNEY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, an assistant commerce commissioner, was paid only $4,000 per year instead of the statutory $5,000 salary for two years due to insufficient appropriations. The court awarded him the unpaid balance of $2,000.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FEES AND SALARIES-when award will be made for additional salary due OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

On the 4th day of October, 1921, claimant was appointed assistant commerce commissioner and served in that capacity until July 29th, 1925, when he was reappointed, his appointments being made under the provisions of the Act concerning public utilities. Section Five of that Act fixes the salary of the assistant commerce commissioners at $5,000.00 per annum. The Fifty-third General Assembly, in making the appropriations for the ordinary and contingent expenses of the State government, failed to appropriate sufficient funds to pay the assistant commerce commissioners in full and claimant was paid only $4,000.00 a year for the two years following July 1st, 1923, leaving $2,000.00 due him for services rendered during those two years, and he has filed his claim for the $2,000.00 due him. It is conceded by the attorney general that claimant performed the services of an assistant commerce commissioner during those two years and that he is entitled to recover from the State the unpaid balance of his salary.

It is therefore ordered that claimant be awarded the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00).

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.