W. F. BARTON, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant moved to dismiss the case, and the court dismissed it because no reason was shown why it should not be dismissed.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where there is no cause shown why case should not be dismissed, same will be dismissed upon motion of claimant.

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where there is no cause shown why case should not be dismissed, same will be dismissed upon motion of claimant. B. L. KINK, for claimant. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLETON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where there is no cause shown why case should not be dismissed, same will be dismissed upon motion of claimant.

B. L. KINK, for claimant.

OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLETON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM: This cause coming on to be heard upon motion of claimant that the above entitled cause be dismissed, and it appearing that there is no reason why said cause should not be dismissed, It is therefore considered by the court that said cause be, and the same is hereby dismissed.