Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Boyer v. State of Illinois

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 26 Illinois Court of Claims Filed September 13, 1927 No. 900
Disposition: (No. 900-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Boyer v. State of Illinois, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 26 (1927)
Legacy General 6 denied 1920s Boyer v. State of Illinois 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 26 September 13, 1927 (No. 900-Claim denied.) /opinions/v06-p0049-1/

C. P. BOYER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant moved to dismiss his own claim, and the court dismissed the cause without any award.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed on motion of claimant. Where OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE- GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTION-construction and maintenance of highways. CONSTRUCTION-Section 4, Court of Claims Act. Under Section 4 of the NEGLIGENCE-contributory negligence by claimant. No award will be HIGHWAYS-maintenance of highways. Claimant is not entitled to re-

DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed on motion of claimant. Where there is no cause shown why case should not be dismissed, same will be dismissed upon motion of claimant.

C. P. BOYER, pro se.

OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLETON, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM: This cause coming on to be heard upon oral motion of claimant that the above entitled cause be dismissed and it appearing that the cause should be dismissed, It is therefore considered that said cause be, and the same is hereby dismissed. [*27] (Claims denied.)

THEODORE STODDARD, 1086; FLOYD CLAUSER, 1067; WALTER ARNOLD, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF VERNON ARNOLD, Deceased,

Official volume 6 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1927–June 30, 1931)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.