Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Smith v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 433 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-05-26 No. 1201
Disposition: (No. 1201-Claimant awarded $1,575.00.) Award: $1,575.00 Agency: Division of Waterways, Department of Purchases and Construction
Cite as: Smith v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 433 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Smith v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 433 1927-05-26 (No. 1201-Claimant awarded $1,575.00.) /opinions/v05-p0453-1/

BESSIE GILBERT SMITH AND ROBERT E. SMITH, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought $1,575.00 for damage to their property caused by a break in the south bank of the Illinois & Michigan canal, which flooded their land with four feet of water for four days. The court awarded the full amount based on the Superintendent of Waterways' recommendation and the Attorney General's consent.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ILLINOIS & MICHIGAN CANAL-when award may be made. This case is OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

The declaration in this case shows that the claimants were the owners of property situated in Section 13, Township 33 North, Range 1, East of the Third Principal Meridian, LaSalle county, Illinois, located one hundred feet south of the Illinois-Michigan canal, approximately three miles due east of the city of LaSalle.

On or about the 8th day of August, 1924, the south bank of the Illinois & Michigan canal broke at a point about two hundred feet from the residence of this affiant and the property above described and that the water therefrom gushed from the break in the bank covering all property belonging to the affiant's wife above stated and continued to flow over said property for four days in a depth of approximately four feet [*434] and that the influx of water from the canal caused damage to said property.

William F. Mulvihill, Superintendent of Waterways, made the following statement: I have examined the foregoing claim and believing the same to be just and true, the Division of Waterways, Department of Purchases and Construction will not oppose the allowance of the same for the amount claimed, which is $1,575.00.

The Attorney General submits this claim to the court and recommends that an award be made in said cause.

We therefore allow said claim in the amount of $1,575.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.