Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Bartley v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 365 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-05-12 No. 1083
Disposition: (No. 1083-Claimant awarded $2,150.00.) Award: $2,150.00
Cite as: Bartley v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 365 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Bartley v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 365 1927-05-12 (No. 1083-Claimant awarded $2,150.00.) /opinions/v05-p0385-1/

JESSE E. BARTLEY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for legal services rendered in prosecuting a suit against the State Treasurer for breach of official bond. The court found the services were valuable and benefited the State, and awarded $2,150 as fair and reasonable compensation.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SERVICES-when State liable for legal service rendered. Where legal ser- OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This is an action brought by claimant for services rendered in prosecuting a certain suit against E. E. Mitchell in his official capacity of State Treasurer on an alleged breach of his official bond.

It appears that claimant was employed in a legal manner by the Attorney General of the State, and it does appear that he performed valuable services for the State, as shown by the evidence; in fact, the court has been informed and so believes that he recovered for the State of Illinois, through his efforts in the prosecution of the case against said Mitchell, the sum of $20,000.00. As a matter of fact, the State of Illinois has been benefited through the efforts of this claimant in that amount, and it is disclosed by the records that substantially all of the legal services performed in connection with this case were performed by claimant.

It appears to this court that eminent services were performed by claimant; that the defendant, the State of Illinois, was benefited in both money and costs by the efforts of the claimant, and it further appears to the court that as a matter [*366] of equity and good conscience, if not as a matter of law, and we believe there has been a legal contract between the State of Illinois and claimant for the performance of these services, and that therefore the claimant should be paid a fair and reasonable amount for the services actually rendered the people of the State of Illinois.

This court, after viewing all of the facts in the case and after diligently investigating the value of the work performed by the claimant, is of the opinion that the fair and reasonable compensation to be paid to the claimant for the services performed would be, and the court hereby recommends, that the claimant be allowed the sum of $2,150.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.