Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Meyer v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 330 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-03-29 No. 1163
Disposition: (No. 1163-Claimant awarded $172.00.) Award: $172.00 Agency: Military and Naval Department
Cite as: Meyer v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 330 (1927)
Line of Duty Compensation 5 awarded 1920s Meyer v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 330 1927-03-29 (No. 1163-Claimant awarded $172.00.) /opinions/v05-p0350-1/

DR. J. G. MEYER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a physician, treated Private Lewis J. Bourland of the Illinois National Guard for mumps and grippe incurred in the line of duty. The court found the claim just and recommended an award of $172.00.

Claim type: Line Of Duty Death

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. MILITARY SERVICE-when award may be made. There being no dispute OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; MERRILL F. WEHM-

It appears that claimant is and was a regularly licensed physician practicing the profession in the city of Springfield, Illinois, on December 10, 1924, to March 31, 1925. And it further appears that Private Lewis J. Bourland while on regular and order duty, a member of Company C, 130th Infantry, Illinois National Guard, became ill with mumps and the grippe and did receive treatment from said claimant as a physician between said dates and that the amount claimed by [*331] said claimant for such treatment is $172.00. It further appears that C. E. Black, Adjutant General, addressed a letter to the Attorney General stating "that the board found that the disability of Private Bourland was incurred in line of duty and recommended that his medical treatment be paid and that claimant was the attending physician and that his bill for such services in the sum of $172.00 has not been paid by the Military and Naval Department."

It appears to the court that said claim is just and recommended as aforesaid that it should be allowed. This court recommends that said claim be awarded in the sum of $172.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.