DEARBORN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought a franchise tax refund or similar relief. The court denied the claim, citing its decision in Moline Plow Co. v. State as controlling.

Claim type: Other

Cases cited: Moline Plow Co. v. State, No. 687a

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

FRANCHISE TAX-when court without jurisdiction. The decision of the court announced in the case of Moline Plow Co. v. State, supra, governs this claim.

FRANCHISE TAX-when court without jurisdiction. The decision of the court announced in the case of Moline Plow Co. v. State, supra, governs this claim. MILLS & HOWE, for claimant. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; EDWARD C. FITCH, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARITY delivered the opinion of the court:

For the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in this court in the case of Moline Plow Company v. State of Illinois, No. 687a, this claim is disallowed.