Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

American Bosch Magneto Corporation v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 263 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-01-10 No. 1080
Disposition: (No. 1080-Claimant awarded $154.11.) Award: $154.11 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: American Bosch Magneto Corporation v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 263 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s American Bosch Magneto Corporation v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 263 1927-01-10 (No. 1080-Claimant awarded $154.11.) /opinions/v05-p0285-2/

AMERICAN BOSCH MAGNETO CORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought a refund of $154.11 in franchise tax erroneously paid to the Secretary of State. The court awarded the refund after the Attorney General consented and the Secretary of State admitted the overpayment.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FRANCHISE TAX-when claimant entitled to refund. This case is con- OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This is a claim of American Bosch Magneto Corporation for a refund of $154.11 franchise tax erroneously paid to the [*266] Secretary of State for the period beginning July 1, 1925, and ending June 30, 1926, in excess of the amount legally due under the provisions of the General Corporation Act.

The Attorney General first filed a demurrer on behalf of the State and afterward filed a statement, attached to which is a copy of a letter from the Secretary of State admitting that claimant is entitled to a refund of $154.11, and the Attorney General consents to an award in favor of claimant for that sum.

As the State was overpaid that amount, the demurrer will be overruled and claimant awarded the sum of $154.11.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.