Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

The Cable Company v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-01-19 No. 994
Disposition: (No. 994-Claimant awarded $250.00.) Award: $250.00 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: The Cable Company v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s The Cable Company v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262 1927-01-19 (No. 994-Claimant awarded $250.00.) /opinions/v05-p0282-1/

THE CABLE COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The Cable Company claimed a refund of $250.00 in franchise tax erroneously paid to the Secretary of State. The court found the claim just and awarded $250.00.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FRANCHISE TAX-when refund will be made. Overpayment. This case is OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This is a claim filed by the Cable Company for a refund of $250.00 franchise tax erroneously paid to the Secretary of State for the period beginning July, 1923, and ending June 30, 1924. The amount legally due the State from claimant for this period was the sum of $250.00, but the Secretary of State demanded, and claimant paid, $500.00.

The Attorney General has filed a statement and attached thereto a letter from the Secretary of State as an exhibit, in which the Secretary of State admits that this claim is just and should be allowed, and the Attorney General in his statement consents to an award in favor of claimant in the sum of $250.00.

As the amount of tax legally due was only $250.00, we therefore allow claimant an award in the sum of $250.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.