Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Indiana Bridge Co. v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 247 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1927-01-10 No. 924
Disposition: (No. 924-Claimant awarded $418.00.) Award: $416.00 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Indiana Bridge Co. v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 247 (1927)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Indiana Bridge Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 247 1927-01-10 (No. 924-Claimant awarded $418.00.) /opinions/v05-p0267-1/

INDIANA BRIDGE COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought reimbursement for extra labor in changing the design and construction of the Peoria Armory. The court awarded $416.00 based on the supervising engineer's admission and proof of actual expenditure.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACT-when State liable. There being no dispute as to the facts OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This is a claim for extra labor in changing the design and construction of the Peoria Armory at Peoria, Illinois.

On the 10th of May, 1923, claimant entered into a written contract with the defendant to provide all the materials and perform all the work shown on the drawings and described in the specifications for structural steel of the Armory building for the National Guard at Peoria, for an agreed price of $28,- 230.00.

On the 27th day of July, 1923, the defendant, through the Department of Public Works and Buildings, entered into a supplemental contract with claimant whereby claimant agreed to deliver and erect an additional steel truss for the building, together with columns, purlins, girts and lintels, for an additional sum of $6,400.00. This additional work made it necessary to change the drawings and, by direction of the supervising architect of the defendant, the necessary changes were made.

The Attorney General, on behalf of defendant, has filed a statement and attached thereto a letter from the supervising [*248] engineer of the defendant in which he admits that claimant is entitled to an award for the changes made in the design and construction of the Armory. The proof of the claim is in the form of affidavits and claimant actually expended $416.00 in having these changes made. Claimant is therefore awarded the sum of $416.00 to reimburse it for the amount expended in having the changes made in the drawings.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.