Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 211 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1926-09-14 No. 789
Disposition: (No. 789-Claimant awarded $98.00.) Award: $98.00 Agency: State Highway Department
Cite as: C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 211 (1926)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 211 1926-09-14 (No. 789-Claimant awarded $98.00.) /opinions/v05-p0231-1/

CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought compensation for storage charges on gravel shipped to the State Highway Department. The court found legal liability and awarded $98.00 based on the tariff schedule.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. DEMURRAGE-when State liable. The State is liable for a reasonable stor-

Claimant was on the 23d day of May, 1921, operating its line of railroad in and through the State of Illinois and [*212] GARNS v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

through the village of Ridge Farm, Vermillion county, Illinois, and it appears that said railroad transported a car containing gravel billed to the State Highway Department; that said billing was directed to the Department of Highway at Ridge Farm, and that notice was given of such shipment to agents of the defendant.

It appears to this court that the gravel in question was stored and kept after such notice was given and according to the laws of the State of Illinois the claimant would be required to make charges for such storage, even if they were disposed to waive their claim and from the record we are of the opinion there is a legal liability.

Therefore the only question remaining for the court to consider is the amount of the award and from the evidence the court must follow the tariff schedule filed and from all the evidence it appears that claimant is entitled to recover $98.00. Therefore claim is allowed in the sum of $98.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.