Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Hasbrouch v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 197 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-05-01 No. 908
Disposition: (No. 908-Claimant awarded $2,500.00.) Award: $2,500.00 Agency: Illinois Soldiers' and Sailors' Orphans' Home
Cite as: Hasbrouch v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 197 (1925)
Line of Duty Compensation 5 awarded 1920s Hasbrouch v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 197 1925-05-01 (No. 908-Claimant awarded $2,500.00.) /opinions/v05-p0217-1/

MARY HASBROUCH, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a civil service nurse, slipped on ice and broke her hip while working at the Children's Nursery. The court found that in equity and good conscience she should be allowed $2,500.00 for her injuries.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. RESPONDENT'S SUPERIOR-social justice and equity. The State is not liable 138 LENNOX-HALDEMAN CO. v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

This is a case brought on account of injuries sustained while she was regularly employed as a civil service nurse in the Children's Nursery at the Illinois Soldiers' and Sailors' Orphans' Home; that during her employment and while in the course of employment she slipped upon an icy walk, fell and injured her hip, breaking the hip bone; that since said accident she has suffered intense pain and is still severely and permanently incapacitated. It further appears that the claimant was a valuable and faithful servant of the State, and that she is without means of support, other than the charity of her friends and her community.

It is the opinion of this court that in equity and good conscience an allowance should be had in this case as it is our belief that a reasonable protection should be given by the State to those of her servants who were injured in the line of duty. It is therefore recommended that claimant be allowed the sum of $2,500.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.