Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

R v. Delay

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 192 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-05-01 No. 900
Disposition: (No. 900-Claimant awarded $375.00.) Award: $375.00
Cite as: R v. Delay, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 192 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s R v. Delay 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 192 1925-05-01 (No. 900-Claimant awarded $375.00.) /opinions/v05-p0212-1/

R. V. DELAY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought compensation for injuries sustained while performing military duties when he was struck by a handcar at a railroad crossing. The court sustained the Attorney General's demurrer but found the amount of $375.00 equitable and awarded that sum.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. MILITARY SERVICE-when State not liable. Although there may be no OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This is a claim for injuries sustained by claimant while in the discharge of military duties for the State of Illinois, and declaration sets forth that on October 29, 1922, while on duty in Co. I, 130th Infantry with his company at the (Chicago & Alton Railroad shops at Bloomington, Illinois, in the evening of said date, it being dark, he was walking along the track of the said railroad company, in the exercise of due care and caution, to inspect relief, and that while so crossing said track, he was struck by a handcar and knocked to the ground, and thereby became greatly bruised, hurt and wounded and divers bones in his body were broken, and since said time he has been unable to attend to his affairs and occupation.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is, as a matter of law, sustained.

The amount of the claim $375.00, we believe to be equitable and just, and we accordingly award claimant the sum of $375.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.