Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Broadhurst v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-05-01 No. 851
Disposition: (No. 851-Claimant awarded $1,800.00.) Award: $1,800.00 Agency: Illinois State Prison
Cite as: Broadhurst v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Broadhurst v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173 1925-05-01 (No. 851-Claimant awarded $1,800.00.) /opinions/v05-p0193-2/

JAMES G. BROADHURST, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a prison guard, was assaulted by an inmate and suffered serious injuries. The court found no legal liability but awarded $1,800 in equity and good conscience.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTION-when State not liable. The State in conduct- EQUITY AND GOOD CONSCIENCE-award may be made. The court may OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; FRANK R. EAGLE-

This claimant was employed as a guard at the Illinois New State's Prison on the 10th of November, 1924. About ten [*174] o'clock of that day he was in the yard of said institution performing his usual ordered and customary duties having charge of inmates who were doing construction work; that an inmate by the name of Robert Johnson beat and assaulted the plaintiff on the head causing dangerous and painful injury.

It appears to the court that the plaintiff was injured through this assault receiving a laceration over the top of the head about four inches long and another laceration on the side of the head three inches long and that his back was wrenched and bruised; that by the result of such injuries the claimant was disabled for a considerable period and that he will have a scar on the top of his head and that his face will be marred and scarred for life and that he has a ringing in his head, is dizzy and unable to properly perform his usual and customary duties.

As it has been held by this court on many prior cases, there is no legal liability against the State of Illinois but as a matter of equity and good conscience it is considered that employees of the State engaged in these hazardous occupations should receive at least the same consideration in case of injury as if they were employed by a private corporation or individual.

Therefore it is considered by the court that the claimant be allowed the sum of $1,800.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.