Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Van Dorn Iron Wks. Co. v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 150 1925-05-01 (No. 790-Claimant awarded $2,000.00.) /opinions/v05-p0170-2/ THE VAN DORN IRON WORKS COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
The claimant sought a refund of franchise taxes paid in excess of the amount due. The court sustained the Attorney General's demurrer as a matter of law but, on grounds of social justice and equity, awarded the claimant $2,000.00.
Claim type: Tax Refund
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- FRANCHISE TAX-when refund may be awarded. Although there may be no legal liability against the State to refund the amount of a franchise tax paid in excess of the amount due the State, yet as a matter of social justice and equity an award may be made in favor of claimant for the excess tax paid.
FRANCHISE TAX-when refund may be awarded. Although there may be no legal liability against the State to refund the amount of a franchise tax paid in excess of the amount due the State, yet as a matter of social justice and equity an award may be made in favor of claimant for the excess tax paid. DUSTIN, MCKEENAN, MENNICK, ANTER & STEWART, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; EDWARD C. FITCH, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
MR. JUSTICE LEACH delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim for the refund of certain portions of franchise taxes paid to the Secretary of State of the State of Illi[*151]nois by above named claimant, total amount paid in excess of amount due being $2000.00.
The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is, as a matter of law, sustained.
On the grounds of social justice and equity, we award claimant the sum of $2,000.00.
Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.