Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Herendeen Milling Company v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 125 1925-05-01 (No. 711-Claimant, awarded $8,787.50.) /opinions/v05-p0145-1/ HERENDEEN MILLING COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
The claimant sought a refund of franchise taxes paid erroneously to the Secretary of State for the years 1921-1923. The court sustained the state's demurrer as a matter of law but awarded the amount of $8,787.50 on grounds of social justice and equity.
Claim type: Tax Refund
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- FRANCHISE TAX-when refund may be awarded. Although there may be
FRANCHISE TAX-when refund may be awarded. Although there may be no legal liability on behalf of the State, the court may as an act of social justice and equity award a refund of the tax erroneously paid. JOHNSON, MORAN, PALZER & O'DONNELL, for claimant.
OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General; EDWARD C. FITCH, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
MR. JUSTICE LEECH delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim to refund certain portions of franchise taxes paid erroneously to the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois by above claimant, in the years 1921, 1922 and 1923, total excess tax paid amounting to $8,787.50.
The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is, as a matter of law, sustained.
On the grounds of social justice and equity, we award claimant the sum of $8,787.50.
Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.