Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Schmania v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 115 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1925-04-16 No. 876
Disposition: (No. 876-Claimant awarded $244.26.) Award: $244.26
Cite as: Schmania v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 115 (1925)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Schmania v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 115 1925-04-16 (No. 876-Claimant awarded $244.26.) /opinions/v05-p0135-1/

FRANK SCHMANIA, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF LORENZ SCHMANIA, Deceased, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought a refund of inheritance tax erroneously paid under Section 10 of the inheritance tax law. The court awarded the refund because the county court had reversed the erroneous order, the evidence supported the claim, and the Attorney General consented to the award.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. INHERITANCE TAX-when claimant entitled to refund. Sec. 10. Where

The claimant, Frank Schmania, executor of the estate of Lorenz Schmania, deceased, brings this suit for a refund of inheritance tax erroneously paid under Section 10 of the inheritance tax law in the sum of $244.26, which amount was paid by an erroneous order of the county judge.

An appeal was in due time taken to the county court, and on proper hearing at which the Attorney General was represented the county court reversed the order and ordered the said sum, so erroneously paid, refunded.

The evidence supports the claim, which is likewise admitted by the Attorney General in this case, who consents to an award for the sum so erroneously paid.

An award in the sum of $244.26 to claimant.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.