Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Boynton v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1924-09-16 No. 771
Disposition: (No. 771-Claimant awarded $3,873.15.) Award: $3,673.15
Cite as: Boynton v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 (1924)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Boynton v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 1924-09-16 (No. 771-Claimant awarded $3,873.15.) /opinions/v05-p0044-1/

DONALD S. BOYNTON et al., EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES T. BOYNTON, Deceased, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought refund of overpaid inheritance tax due to inadvertent failure to deduct a primary liability of the decedent. The court awarded $3,673.15 based on the facts and consent of the Attorney General.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. INHERITANCE TAX-when refund may be made-modification of order.

Charles T. Boynton of Lake County, Illinois, died February 27, 1923, leaving a last will and testament, and [*25] claimants were appointed and qualified executors of said will and testament.

In August, 1923, the county judge of Lake County entered an order fixing the inheritance tax in said estate at $32,045.04 and the same was paid. This was based upon a valuation of the estate at $1,006,065.85, and the total deductions were found to be $262,025.73, leaving a fair value of the appraisable property to be $744,040.12, and an order was entered fixing the tax at said last named sum. At the time of the death of deceased he was guarantor on a demand note of $85,000.00 executed by C. D. Caldwell, payable to the order of the Continental and Commercial Trust and Savings Bank of Chicago, dated January 24, 1921. That $42,500.00 of said note was a primary liability of the decedent, which was paid in due course of administration by claimants, but by inadvertence was not taken into consideration when credits or charges against the estate were deducted as heretofore stated. A petition was later filed by the claimants in the county court showing the facts and the original order was modified ordering a deduction of the last named amount, and a total tax of $28,371.89 in place of the tax as originally fixed. This makes an over-payment by claimants of $3,673.15 which claimants contend should be refunded to them. The Attorney General states that he has investigated the facts and evidence, finds them to be true and consents to an award for the amount claimed. From the statement of the facts, supported by proper evidence and consent of the Attorney General, the court awards the sum of $3,673.15 payable to the claimants.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.