Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

City of Pontiac v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 15 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1924-05-14 No. 755
Disposition: (No. 755-Claimant awarded $1020.00.) Award: $1,020.00 Agency: Department of Public Welfare
Cite as: City of Pontiac v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 15 (1924)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s City of Pontiac v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 15 1924-05-14 (No. 755-Claimant awarded $1020.00.) /opinions/v05-p0035-1/

CITY OF PONTIAC, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The City of Pontiac claimed $1,020.00 from the State of Illinois for costs of operating a sewage disposal plant serving the Illinois State Reformatory. The court awarded the full amount based on the Department of Public Welfare's approval and the Attorney General's consent.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION-when claim in favor of may be allowed. There

This is a claim filed by the City of Pontiac, a municipal corporation, of the State of Illinois, in the sum of $1,020.00, due to said city from the State of Illinois, as a part of the cost of operating and maintaining a septic sewage disposal plant located near the City of Pontiac and through which all of the sewage of the Illinois State Reformatory, a State institution, is disposed of.

The claim has been investigated and approved by the Department of Public Welfare. The Attorney General of the State of Illinois consents to an award in the above amount, from February 1, 1922, to June 30, 1923, at the rate of $60.00 per month.

The court therefore awards the claimant the sum of $1,020.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.