Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Atlas Mills (corp.) v. State of Illinois

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 5 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1924-01-15 No. 649
Disposition: (No. 649-Claimant awarded $25.00) Award: $25.00 Agency: Department of Agriculture
Cite as: Atlas Mills (corp.) v. State of Illinois, 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 5 (1924)
Legacy General 5 awarded 1920s Atlas Mills (corp.) v. State of Illinois 5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 5 1924-01-15 (No. 649-Claimant awarded $25.00) /opinions/v05-p0025-1/

ATLAS MILLS (CORP.), Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought a refund of $25 paid to the Department of Agriculture under the Pure Food Law for selling wheat middling, arguing the payment was not required. The court, with the Attorney General's consent, awarded the $25 refund.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PURE FOOD ACT-when moneys paid under may be refunded. When

This is a claim filed by the Atlas Mills, claimant, against the State of Illinois, setting forth that the Atlas Mills has paid into the state treasury of the State of Illinois through the Department of Agriculture the sum of $25.00 under the erroneous impression that said claimant was obliged to make this payment under the Pure Food Law; that under the laws of the State of Illinois said claimant was not obliged to pay said amount for the reason that the commodities sold by said Atlas Mills, claimant, was a pure wheat middling and that no amount was required to be paid by the claimant to the State.

The Department of Agriculture admits that the above payment was made and that the same was turned over to the State Treasurer.

The Attorney General filed a statement consenting to an award of $25.00.

The court therefore awards the claimant the sum of $25.00.

Official volume 5 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1923–June 30, 1927)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.