THE CITY OF CHICAGO v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.
Case summary
The City of Chicago claimed payment for water furnished to the Chicago State Hospital from October 10, 1914 to June 30, 1921. The court allowed the claim, finding the account was a continuing one, the price reasonable, and the claim just, rejecting the State's statute of limitations defense.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- CONTRACT-when State is liable. The State is liable for water furnished SAME-when Statute of limitations cannot be pleaded. Where the con-
THE CITY OF CHICAGO
v.
STATE OF ILLINOIS.
Opinion Filed April 18, 1923.
CONTRACT-when State is liable. The State is liable for water furnished to the Chicago State Hospital, at Dunning, Ill.
SAME-when Statute of limitations cannot be pleaded. Where the contract is a continuing one, and the arrangement and price are reasonable the claim is not barred.
Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State.
This is a claim filed by the City of Chicago against the defendant for water furnished by it to the Chicago State Hospital located at Dunning, Illinois, for the period commencing October 10, 1914, and ending June 30, 1921.
There is no dispute as to the fact of the water being furnished as alleged by the claimant and there is no dispute as to the amount charged for such water service.
The defendant comes and files his plea of the Statute and Limitations.
It appears from the evidence and arguments of counsel that the account was a continuing one and that the arrangement and the price charged was very reasonable and that the account is actually a just one.
It is therefore considered by the Court that the claim should be allowed and it is hereby recommended by this Court that the claimant be allowed the sum of $16,006.37. [*346]
OGAN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.