CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimant sought $25.00 under a written contract for providing use of a side track to the Illinois Soldiers and Sailors Home at Quincy for two quarters. The court found ample proof and the Attorney General consented, so an award of $25.00 was entered.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

CONTRACT-when State is liable. There being no dispute as to the facts

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State. The proof is ample and the attorney general files his written con-

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed April 18, 1923.

CONTRACT-when State is liable. There being no dispute as to the facts and law governing this case the Court enters an award to claimant for the amount of its claim.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State.

Claimant files his claim for $25.00 based on a written contract to furnish use of side track of complainant to Illinois Soldiers and Sailors Home at Quincy for two quarters ending March 31, 1917, and September 30, 1918, for $12.50 per quarter equals $25.00.

The proof is ample and the attorney general files his written consent to allowance of $25.00 for which an award is hereby made.