Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Central Coal Company v. State of Illinois

4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1923-03-08
Disposition: awarded Award: $145.49 Agency: Elgin State Hospital
Cite as: Central Coal Company v. State of Illinois, 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 (1923)
Legacy General 4 awarded 1920s Central Coal Company v. State of Illinois 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 1923-03-08 awarded /opinions/v04-p0327-1/

CENTRAL COAL COMPANY v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

The Central Coal Company claimed $145.49 for coal supplied to the Elgin State Hospital. The court awarded the full amount after the Attorney General consented to the award.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACT-when State liable. The State is liable for supplies fur-

CENTRAL COAL COMPANY

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed March 8, 1923.

CONTRACT-when State liable. The State is liable for supplies furnished to the Elgin State Hospital.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State.

This is a claim for the sum of $145.49 filed by the Central Coal Company, a Wisconsin corporation, for 102,100 pounds of screenings purchased of the claimant by the State of Illinois for the Elgin State Hospital and shipped from Standard, Illinois, February 25, 1918.

Affidavit of claim is attached to the statement and bears the approval of the Department of Public Welfare, showing that the coal was purchased by express authority of law.

The Attorney General waives further proof of claim and consents to an award in the sum of one hundred forty-five dollars and forty-nine cents ($145.49) without interest.

Therefore the Court awards the claimant the sum of one hundred forty-five dollars and forty nine cents ($145.49) without interest.

Official volume 4 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1923)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.