Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Atkinson v. State of Illinois

3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 105 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1916-12-22
Disposition: awarded Award: $1,730.35 Agency: State Civil Service Commission
Cite as: Atkinson v. State of Illinois, 3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 105 (1916)
Legacy General 3 awarded 1910s Atkinson v. State of Illinois 3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 105 1916-12-22 awarded /opinions/v03-p0119-1/

THOMAS L. ATKINSON v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimant, a classified civil service employee, was unlawfully discharged without charges or hearing and later reinstated. The court awarded him back pay for the period of discharge.

Claim type: Employment Back Pay

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FERA AND BARRETT-unlawful discharge of civil service employees. A person in the classified State Civil Service who is unlawfully discharged from his position, and later reinstated is entitled to payment of his salary during the period of such discharge.

THOMAS L. ATKINSON

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed December 22, 1916.

FERA AND BARRETT-unlawful discharge of civil service employees. A person in the classified State Civil Service who is unlawfully discharged from his position, and later reinstated is entitled to payment of his salary during the period of such discharge.

T. J. Sullivan, for Claimant.

P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, for State.

The claimant in this case, Thomas L. Atkinson, states that on the second day of November, 1912, he was certified by the State Civil Service Commission of the State of Illinois, as general bookkeeper to the Board of Administration of the State of Illinois, and that on and after said date he continued to be a member of the classified State Civil Service of the State of Illinois.

The evidence in this case shows that on the 13th day of February, A. D. 1915, claimant was discharged from said position by the State Civil Service Commission without any charges having been preferred against him, and without any hearing having been given him before the State Civil Service Commission, except that he was required to take an examination for an efficiency test, and that he failed to receive the necessary passing grade. The evidence further shows that afterwards, on the 1st day of February, A. D. 1916, this claimant was reinstated by the State Civil Service Commission to the position formerly held by him, as above mentioned, and at the salary of $150.00 per month, the salary he also received prior to his discharge.

The claimant now presents his claim to this Court for his unpaid salary from the 13th day of February, 1915, to the 1st day of February, 1916, amounting to the sum of $1,730.35, on the ground that he was unlawfully discharged.

The State does not contend that claimant is not entitled to this salary, as he was unlawfully discharged.

We therefore make an award to claimant in the sum of one thousand seven hundred thirty and 35/100 ($1,730.35) dollars. [*101]

LOZZA v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Official volume 3 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1916)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.