Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Cora Dann Lozza v. State of Illinois

3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 101 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1916-12-22
Disposition: awarded Award: $500.00
Cite as: Cora Dann Lozza v. State of Illinois, 3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 101 (1916)
Legacy General 3 awarded 1910s Cora Dann Lozza v. State of Illinois 3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 101 1916-12-22 awarded /opinions/v03-p0095-1/

CORA DANN LOZZA v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimant sought damages in a case governed by the facts of Frank O. Johnson v. State of Illinois. The court found the facts almost identical and awarded $500.00.

Claim type: Other

Cases cited: Frank O. Johnson v. State of Illinois, 2 Ct. of Cl. R. p. 227

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. DAMAGES-Johnson v. State, ante followed. This case is governed by

CORA DANN LOZZA

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed December 22, 1916.

DAMAGES-Johnson v. State, ante followed. This case is governed by the facts in the case of Frank O. Johnson v. State of Illinois, 2 Ct. of Cl.

R. p. 227.

Logger & Blatt and Brown, Hay & Creighton, for Claimant.

P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, for State.

The facts in this case are almost identical with the facts in the case of Frank O. Johnson v. State of Illinois, decided May 22, 1914, in the Court of Claims, and reported in Volume 2, Ct. of Cl. R., at page 227.

On the authority of that case, claimant is entitled to an award, and the only question for this Court to decide is as to the proper amount that should be awarded.

From a consideration of the evidence as offered by claimant and the State, it is the opinion of this Court that claimant shall be awarded $500.00.

It is accordingly the judgment of this Court that she be awarded said amount.

Official volume 3 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1916)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.