Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Eaton v. State of Illinois

3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 26 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1916-12-11
Disposition: awarded Award: $245.45
Cite as: Eaton v. State of Illinois, 3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 26 (1916)
Legacy General 3 awarded 1910s Eaton v. State of Illinois 3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 26 1916-12-11 awarded /opinions/v03-p0040-1/

EDWARD W. EATON, ET AL. v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimants sought a refund of inheritance tax paid on a trust estate that failed when the widow died and the remainder vested in the children, whose shares were each under the exemption. The court awarded the full amount paid, plus interest, because the tax was not due.

Claim type: Tax Refund

Statutes cited: section 25 of the inheritance tax law

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. 1. INHERITANCE TAX-failure of trust ground for refund-when. 2. INTEREST-when allowed. Where the right to a refund is estab-

EDWARD W. EATON, ET AL.

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed December 11, 1916.

1. INHERITANCE TAX-failure of trust ground for refund-when. Where an estate is left to a person upon a condition, the happening of which may defeat the estate, and an inheritance tax has been paid upon the assumption that the estate will not be defeated, an award will be made.

2. INTEREST-when allowed. Where the right to a refund is established under section 25 of the inheritance tax law, interest will be allowed.

Kerr & Kerr, for Claimants.

P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, for State.

The will of Thomas W. Eaton, deceased, probated in the Probate Court of Cook County, created a trust estate making Olive M. Eaton and Edward W. Eaton, trustees to manage same, to make certain payments to beneficiaries named, and on the death of the widow to divide the remainder equally among his son and four daughters.

An inheritance tax was assessed on appraised value of $41,261.38, with an exemption therefrom of $20,000.00, at the rate of one per cent, making a tax of $212.61, to which was added interest of $32.94, a total of $245.45, which was paid on December 16, 1912.

The widow, Olive M. Eaton, died on July 23, 1914, and the five children named by the testator survived her and took the remainder of the estate. Claim is now made for refund of the tax paid on the theory that the trust has failed, and that the estates created by the will have now vested.

Under the provisions of section 25 of the inheritance tax law, claimants are entitled to a refund.

It is apparent that the values of the estates inherited by the several claimants are less than $20,000.00, and that in consequence no tax can be imposed, so that claimants should have refunded to them the entire amount paid, together with interest at three per cent from the date of payment.

It is accordingly the judgment of this Court that the claimants, Edward W. Eaton, Charlotte G. Gardner, Marian A. Wade, Jessie M. Taylor, and Ethel B. Gassneck, be awarded the sum of $245.45, together with interest thereon at three per cent from September 16, 1912.

Official volume 3 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1916)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.