Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Jones v. State of Illinois

1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 220 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1900-12-16
Disposition: dismissed
Cite as: Jones v. State of Illinois, 1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 220 (1900)
Legacy General 1 dismissed 1900s Jones v. State of Illinois 1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 220 1900-12-16 dismissed /opinions/v01-p0250-1/

CYRUS A. JONES v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claimant sought additional compensation for services rendered. The court sustained the State's demurrer, relying on Knapp v. State, holding the State not liable, and dismissed the case.

Claim type: Contract

Cases cited: Knapp v. State, ante p. 21

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. MILLER-Claim for additional compensation for services rendered.

CYRUS A. JONES

v.

THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed December 16, 1909.

MILLER-Claim for additional compensation for services rendered. The Commission sustains a demurrer to claimant's petition upon the authority of Knapp v. the State ante p. 21.

In the above entitled cause the State filed a demurrer, based on two grounds:

First: That there is no liability under the law existing against the State.

Second: That the claimant has failed to comply with the rules of the Commission concerning the filing of proofs.

The first point in the demurrer is based on the decision of the Commission in the case of Wm. Knapp, et al, decided at the August term, 1909, in which the Commission held that in such cases the State was not liable. The reasons being fully set forth in the opinion written by Judge W. S. Loudon we do not deem it necessary to go into any argument of the matter, the Commission having decided to sustain the demurrer and dismiss the case.

Case dismissed.

Official volume 1 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1905)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.