Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Ryan v. State of Illinois

1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 146 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1897-02-17
Disposition: awarded Award: $31.50
Cite as: Ryan v. State of Illinois, 1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 146 (1897)
Legacy General 1 awarded 1890s Ryan v. State of Illinois 1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 146 1897-02-17 awarded /opinions/v01-p0176-1/

ELIZABETH H. RYAN v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Case summary

Claim for clerical services in taking and transcribing testimony at the request of the Attorney General. The court allowed the claim, finding the charges just and reasonable.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CLERICAL SERVICES-reasonable allowance made for services ren-

ELIZABETH H. RYAN

v.

THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Opinion filed February 17, 1897.

CLERICAL SERVICES-reasonable allowance made for services rendered at request of State officers. This claim is submitted on affidavits showing services on which claim is based were performed at the request of the Attorney General and that charges made are just and reasonable and the claim is allowed.

This claim is for taking and transcribing testimony to be used on behalf of the defense in the case of Catharine Cutting v. The People of the State of Illinois.

The Attorney General enters the appearance of the State and submits the cause for hearing and decision upon the affidavits attached to the claim. The affidavits show that the services were performed at the request of [*147] the Attorney General, and that the charges made are just and reasonable. It is therefore considered that the claimant, Elizabeth H. Ryan be, and she is awarded the sum of thirty-one dollars and fifty cents ($31.50) in full of her claim.

Official volume 1 (Compiled and Reported by the Authority of the State of Illinois 1905)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.